A hostage to fortune

I have to admit that it looks as if I was completely wrong about Barak Obama’s electability – there doesn’t appear to be any way that he can lose now. In my defence I would say that I couldn’t have imagined just how badly the GOP would screw up their campaign. With one decision – picking Sarah Palin as his running mate – John McCain threw away the single biggest advantage he had, his ability to criticise Obama’s lack of experience. Palin has done all that could be expected of her, shoring up the core Republican support, but I cannot fathom how McCain’s strategists ever thought she would be able to appeal to voters beyond the conservative base. McCain himself has tried to pose as both the elder statesman with the wisdom to lead, and the iconoclast who would shake up the establishment, and has failed to convince on either count.

The main factor that has helped the Democrats more than might have been anticipated though is the state of the economy. Back in the primary season it did look like there was trouble brewing, but no one foresaw that the federal government would be taking over the banking system. Now that even the Bush administration believes in state intervention in the economy on a massive scale, McCain’s jibes about Obama’s “socialism” don’t carry much weight.

Could the Republicans try to steal the election by outright fraud? Right-wing pundits have been advancing various theories about how the opinion polls could be wrong, and why we shouldn’t be surprised if McCain does much better than is expected, and you don’t have to be too paranoid to see that as an attempt to prepare the public for an unbelievable result. It seems to me though that the trouble this would cause – I would anticipate serious civil unrest if McCain is declared the winner next week – would far outweigh any advantage to the ruling class of keeping Obama out of the White House. Despite all the Republican rhetoric Obama is no radical, and there is no evidence to suggest that his administration would be seriously inimical to the interests of American capital. Some special interests – defence contractors and oil companies foremost among them – may have to trim their profit forecasts a little, but for the bulk of US corporations it will be business as usual. They are likely to be much more worried about the general economic situation than the prospect of an Obama presidency, and anyway, of the two candidates, he seems to have the firmest grasp of what is actually going on, and what needs to be done to keep US capitalism on the road.

I still think Hillary Clinton would have made a better candidate, and a better president, but I doubt I’ll be feeling too disappointed next Wednesday.

One Response to A hostage to fortune

  1. Are you really a shrink? If so, do you have expertise in Erickson conversational hypnosis? I received a link to a document alleging that Obama is using hypnosis covertly to influence people. The document is here:

    http://www.pennypresslv.com/Obama%27s_Use_of_Hidden_Hypnosis_techniques_in_His_Speeches.pdf

    I’ve read it and have begun researching Milton Erickson’s work. One of the first books I happened to find was this one: “Modern Clinical Hypnosis for Habit Control” written by Citrenbaum, King and Cohen and published in 1985 by Norton. One topic it deals with is the use of hypnosis in smoking cessation. Are you aware that Obama smokes? He has kept his smoking as secret as he can, though he fully admitted to past cocaine use in “Dreams of My Father.”

    I’ve written some about this at my blog. I’m hoping to find an expert who will comment on it. My posts are here:
    http://antiarianna.wordpress.com/2008/11/01/is-there-a-psychologist-in-the-house/

    and here:

    http://antiarianna.wordpress.com/2008/10/31/breaking-obamas-spell/

    After reading the analysis of some of the speeches, I am amazed at how vague they are. I know that it’s characteristic of politicians to avoid making specific claims, but the repetitions, and the audacious commentary “you choose, you believe,” etc are remarkable as well as this statement that Obama made in one speech, not widely known evidently but quite real, “a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, ‘I have to vote for Barack’”

    You can see it in this McCain ad called “The One”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDuB59OPkDU&feature=related

    I was astonished when I saw this. I am not aware of any politician anywhere saying something comparable.

    The urgency associated with Obama’s campaign is noteworthy as well. He says “now” a lot — a common “closing” technique known as much to salesmen as to hypnotists.

    Would appreciate you considered views,

    Best,

    AnnsNewFriend

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s